Atmospheric and Biological Soiling on Natural Stone Surfaces | HMSA Academy
HMSA Academy: Materıals Scıence & Conservatıon

Atmospheric and Biological Soiling on Natural Stone Surfaces: Scientific Analysis, Intervention, and Conservation Strategies

Author: Müge Günel // MSc. Architect & Restoration Specialist

Abstract

The dirt layers formed on natural stone surfaces are not merely an aesthetic issue; they are active deterioration processes affecting the stone’s mineral structure, physical and chemical composition, and long-term durability. Mechanisms such as biological colonization, atmospheric particulate accumulation, and black crust formation progress through chemical reactions, salt mobilization, and mechanical stresses. Cleaning and intervention should not only be seen as visual improvement of the surface but also be approached as a controlled conservation process based on scientific analysis. Protection measures and monitoring processes applied after cleaning and intervention preserve the mineral structure of the natural stone material, ensuring its long-term durability.

I. Analysis of Soiling Mechanisms

1. Biological Colonization
Algae, moss, and lichen formations create a biofilm layer on the stone surface. These formations:

  • Increase moisture retention,
  • Accelerate mineral dissolution through organic acid production,
  • Trigger micro-crack development.

Penetrating the porous structure, biological colonization can weaken surface durability over time.

2. Atmospheric Particulate Accumulation
In urban environments, stone surfaces are covered with:

  • Exhaust gases,
  • Industrial emissions,
  • Heavy metal-containing dusts and carbon particulates.

This accumulation increases surface roughness, facilitating moisture retention and paving the way for chemical reactions.

3. Black Crust Formation
In carbonate stones, sulfur dioxide (SO₂) in the atmosphere reacts with calcium carbonate to form calcium sulfate (gypsum). Gypsum crystals trap carbon particulates, creating a dark-colored, hard crust.

A black crust may look like an old or natural patina; however, this only creates an aesthetic impression of aging. In reality, it is an indicator of ongoing chemical and physical deterioration in the mineral structure of the stone.

II. Scientific Assessment Prior to Intervention

A successful intervention must be based on measurable data, not visual observation.

Microscopic Examination
The depth of the dirt and its interaction with the stone are determined.

Salt Analysis
The presence and mobilization potential of soluble salts are measured. Incorrect cleaning methods can increase damage through crystallization pressure.

pH Measurement
Interventions should not be made without determining the chemical character of the stone.

  • Acidic systems can cause dissolution in carbonate stones.
  • Excessively alkaline applications can trigger salt formation.

The analysis process forms the basis of the intervention method.

III. Conservation and Cleaning Strategies

Basic principle: Minimum impact, maximum control.

1. Chemical Interventions
pH-Balanced Poultice Systems: Poultice applications allow the active ingredient to remain in contact with the surface for a controlled period, providing selective dissolution and reducing the risk of damaging the stone’s mineral structure.

In layers involving chemical transformation, such as black crusts:

  • A combination of controlled chemical softening followed by low-impact mechanical support

can be applied. The aim is to disintegrate the dirt layer, not the stone surface.

2. Mechanical Interventions
Micro-Abrasive Systems:

  • The hardness of the abrasive material must be lower than the hardness of the natural stone being treated.
  • Pressure must be kept to a minimum.
  • The spraying speed and density of the abrasive material must be adjustable.
  • Mock-up (test area) application is mandatory.

Manually Controlled Cleaning: Selective interventions performed with delicate hand tools provide advantages, especially in encrusted areas, and allow the preservation of the surface texture.

3. Water-Based Methods
Nebulization (Misting): Low-pressure water systems:

  • Soften the dirt layer
  • Manage salt mobilization in a controlled manner
  • Reduce surface tension

High-pressure applications can carry water into micro-cracks, posing a long-term risk.

Controlled Drying: Sudden drying after cleaning can increase salt crystallization pressure. Gradual drying should be planned.

4. Biological Intervention Methods

  • Controlled biocidal applications
  • Enzymatic systems
  • Selective biotechnological methods

Surface neutralization and moisture control must be ensured after application.

5. Laser Cleaning (Selective Intervention)
In carbon accumulation and black crusts, controlled laser systems:

  • Provide intervention without physical contact with the surface
  • Offer micro-level selectivity
  • Allow the preservation of the patina

Parameter settings must be optimized through laboratory tests.

IV. Post-Intervention Protection and Stabilization

1. Surface Stabilization

  • Post-cleaning micro-cracks and pores are stabilized with controlled drying and moisture balance.
  • Salt movement and crystallization pressure are minimized.
  • Stabilization preserves the mechanical strength of the stone while providing resistance against re-soiling.

2. Protective Measures

  • Hydrophobic or vapor-permeable protective applications control the water absorption capacity of the stone.
  • Applications must be compatible with the stone’s mineralogy and patina; incorrect interventions and applications can cause irreversible changes.

3. Monitoring and Maintenance

  • Periodic observation tracks the risks of re-soiling and salt accumulation.
  • When necessary, the conservation process is supported by minor interventions.
  • Documentation supports the effectiveness of the application and future conservation plans.

4. Principle of Minimum Intervention
Throughout the entire process, the fundamental principle is “minimum intervention, maximum protection.” Intervention and protection strategies primarily consider the authentic structure and historical value of the stone.

V. Conclusion

Atmospheric and biological soiling on natural stone surfaces develops through a combination of chemical, physical, and environmental processes. Cleaning and intervention constitute a scientific conservation process aimed at the long-term preservation of the material, rather than merely improving the aesthetic appearance of the stone.

Analysis, test application, controlled intervention, and protection strategies form the foundation of a sustainable approach that preserves the authenticity of the stone.

References
  • Camuffo, D. (1995). Physical weathering of stones. Science of the Total Environment, 167(1–3), 1–14.
  • Charola, A. E. (2000). Salts in the deterioration of porous materials: An overview. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 39(3), 327–343.
  • Doehne, E., & Price, C. A. (2010). Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
  • Fassina, V. (1988). The black crusts on Venetian monuments. Studies in Conservation, 33(sup1), 93–99.
  • ICOMOS. (1964). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter).
  • Young, M. E., Murray, M., & Cordiner, P. (2003). Stone cleaning techniques and their impact on stone surfaces. Construction and Building Materials, 17(6–7), 381–389.