Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say? | HMSA Academy<\/title>\n <meta name=\"description\" content=\"Addressing the processes of documentation and reading the structure, which are critical stages in the restoration of cultural heritage buildings, within the context of conservation decisions.\">\n <meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"documentation, restoration, reading the structure, cultural heritage, conservation decisions, restoration ethics, historic building analysis\">\n <meta name=\"author\" content=\"HMSA Academy\">\n\n \n <style>\n .hmsa-article-wrapper {\n font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, sans-serif;\n max-width: 800px;\n margin: 40px auto;\n padding: 0 20px;\n color: #333;\n line-height: 1.6;\n }\n\n \/* Header Area *\/\n .hmsa-header-meta {\n font-size: 13px;\n color: #ba372a; \/* Red Theme *\/\n font-weight: 700;\n text-transform: uppercase;\n letter-spacing: 1px;\n margin-bottom: 10px;\n }\n\n .hmsa-main-title {\n font-size: 34px;\n font-weight: 800;\n color: #111;\n line-height: 1.3;\n margin: 0 0 20px 0;\n padding-bottom: 20px;\n border-bottom: 1px solid #eee;\n }\n\n .hmsa-author-info {\n font-size: 15px;\n color: #666;\n margin-bottom: 40px;\n font-style: italic;\n }\n .hmsa-author-info strong {\n color: #ba372a;\n font-style: normal;\n }\n\n \/* Abstract \/ Intro Box *\/\n .hmsa-intro-box {\n background-color: #fcfcfc;\n border-left: 5px solid #ba372a;\n padding: 25px 30px;\n margin-bottom: 40px;\n border-radius: 0 4px 4px 0;\n }\n .hmsa-intro-title {\n font-size: 18px;\n font-weight: 800;\n color: #ba372a;\n margin-top: 0;\n margin-bottom: 15px;\n }\n .hmsa-intro-text {\n font-size: 16px;\n font-style: italic;\n color: #555;\n margin: 0;\n text-align: justify;\n }\n\n \/* Content Body *\/\n .hmsa-subhead {\n font-size: 24px;\n font-weight: 700;\n color: #ba372a;\n margin-top: 50px;\n margin-bottom: 20px;\n border-bottom: 1px solid #f0f0f0;\n padding-bottom: 10px;\n }\n\n .hmsa-paragraph {\n font-size: 18px;\n line-height: 1.8;\n color: #222;\n margin-bottom: 25px;\n text-align: justify;\n }\n\n .hmsa-list {\n list-style: disc;\n padding-left: 20px;\n margin: 20px 0 30px 40px;\n }\n .hmsa-list li {\n margin-bottom: 12px;\n font-size: 18px;\n line-height: 1.6;\n color: #333;\n text-align: justify;\n }\n\n \/* References Area *\/\n .hmsa-ref-section {\n margin-top: 80px;\n padding: 40px;\n background-color: #f9f9f9;\n border-radius: 8px;\n border-top: 3px solid #eee;\n }\n .hmsa-ref-title {\n display: block;\n font-size: 20px;\n font-weight: 800;\n color: #333;\n margin-bottom: 20px;\n }\n .hmsa-ref-list {\n list-style: none;\n padding: 0;\n margin: 0;\n }\n .hmsa-ref-list li {\n font-size: 14px;\n color: #666;\n margin-bottom: 8px;\n line-height: 1.5;\n padding-left: 15px;\n text-indent: -15px;\n }\n\n \/* Mobile Responsiveness *\/\n @media (max-width: 768px) {\n .hmsa-article-wrapper { padding: 0 15px; margin: 20px auto; }\n .hmsa-main-title { font-size: 26px; }\n .hmsa-subhead { font-size: 20px; margin-top: 30px; }\n .hmsa-paragraph { font-size: 16px; }\n .hmsa-intro-box { padding: 20px; }\n }\n <\/style>\n<\/head>\n<body data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1>\n\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-article-wrapper\">\n \n \n <div class=\"hmsa-header-meta\">HMSA Academy: Conservation Theory & Methodology<\/div>\n <h1 class=\"hmsa-main-title\">Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say, When Does Intervention Begin?<\/h1>\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-author-info\">\n Author: <strong>M\u00fcge G\u00fcnel<\/strong> <span> \/\/ M.Arch & Restoration Specialist<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-intro-box\">\n <h3 class=\"hmsa-intro-title\">Abstract<\/h3>\n <p class=\"hmsa-intro-text\">\n This study addresses the processes of documentation and “reading the structure,” which are among the most critical stages of the restoration process in cultural heritage buildings, within the context of conservation decisions. The quality of data produced before intervention and how this data is interpreted directly determine the scope, method, and ethical limits of the restoration. Documentation is not merely a technical stage that records the current state of the structure; it is an active decision-making mechanism that questions the necessity, timing, and limits of the intervention. The study discusses the irreversible risks of interventions initiated without reading the structure and evaluates the relationship between documentation and intervention in light of conservation theory and international charters.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Introduction<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The restoration process in cultural heritage buildings is not an application area defined solely by physical interventions. The process of documentation and “reading the structure” carried out before intervention constitutes the fundamental stages that determine the direction, limits, and ethical framework of the restoration. This process, which is less visible compared to the application, plays a decisive role in grounding conservation decisions on a scientific and sustainable basis.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Any intervention initiated without producing sufficient data about the structure and interpreting this data can irreversibly damage not only the physical integrity of the structure but also its historical, documentary, and cultural values. Therefore, the critical question in the restoration process is not <em>how<\/em> the intervention will be done, but <em>based on what information<\/em> and <em>when<\/em> it should be initiated.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Documentation: Definition, Purpose, and Scope<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Documentation is the systematic recording of the current state of a cultural property. Survey drawings (r\u00f6l\u00f6ve), photographic records, written assessments, and material and deterioration maps constitute the basic tools of this process. However, documentation should not be treated merely as a technical recording activity.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The documentation process aims:\n <\/p>\n <ul class=\"hmsa-list\">\n <li>To understand the structure, not just to freeze its current state,<\/li>\n <li>To limit the intervention, not to legitimize it,<\/li>\n <li>To start the application at the right time, not to speed it up.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n In this respect, documentation is not a passive preliminary stage of restoration; it is an active component of the direct decision-making process.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Reading the Structure: From Physical Traces to Historical Data<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Reading the structure consists of more than just detecting visible damage. Stratification on wall surfaces, material differences, traces of repairs, and forms of deterioration provide significant data regarding the phases the structure has undergone. These traces are often physical witnesses to historical processes not found in written sources.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Every irregularity or deterioration seen on the structure must be evaluated as data before being treated as a technical problem. This approach renders deterioration not merely a defect to be remedied, but an element that produces information about the structure’s past when read correctly.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Risks of Intervention Without Reading<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Restoration applications initiated without sufficiently conducting the documentation and reading process often yield irreversible results. Incorrect periodization, loss of original material, and the production of artificial integrity are at the forefront of these risks.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Especially in multi-layered structures, when decisions regarding which period to preserve are made without sufficient reading, the structure is either reduced to a single period or hybrid solutions emerge that disrupt historical continuity. This situation weakens the documentary value of the structure while making the scientific quality of the restoration controversial.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">The Ethical Relationship Between Documentation and Intervention<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The documentation process functions not as the initiator of intervention, but often as a mechanism that delays, narrows, and forces a rethinking of it. In this respect, documentation is a significant ethical balance element in restoration practice.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The scope and method of intervention can only become clear as a result of evaluating the data obtained through documentation. This relationship reveals that documentation is not a secondary tool serving the application, but a fundamental decision-making mechanism that guides and limits the intervention.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n In the conservation of cultural heritage, the process of documentation and reading the structure is not the starting point of intervention; it is often a threshold area questioning the necessity of the intervention. Every application made without understanding what the structure says carries the risk of producing information loss, even if it bears a conservation purpose.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Therefore, success in restoration practice should be measured not only by correct applications but by the ability to stop, wait, and prioritize understanding at the right time. Intervention should begin only when the structure speaks and the obtained data make this intervention mandatory.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-ref-section\">\n <span class=\"hmsa-ref-title\">References<\/span>\n <ul class=\"hmsa-ref-list\">\n <li>Ahunbay, Z. (2014). Tarihi \u00c7evre Koruma ve Restorasyon. Istanbul: YEM Yay\u0131n.<\/li>\n <li>Avrami, E., Mason, R., & de la Torre, M. (2000). Values and Heritage Conservation. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.<\/li>\n <li>Feilden, B. M. (2003). Conservation of Historic Buildings. Oxford: Architectural Press.<\/li>\n <li>ICOMOS. (1964). The Venice Charter.<\/li>\n <li>ICOMOS Australia. (2013). The Burra Charter.<\/li>\n <li>Jokilehto, J. (1999). A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford.<\/li>\n <li>Mu\u00f1oz Vi\u00f1as, S. (2005). Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Oxford.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n<\/body>\n<\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say? | HMSA Academy HMSA Academy: Conservation Theory & Methodology<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3181","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

{"id":3181,"date":"2026-02-03T13:03:10","date_gmt":"2026-02-03T10:03:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/?page_id=3181"},"modified":"2026-02-03T13:03:18","modified_gmt":"2026-02-03T10:03:18","slug":"documentation-and-reading-in-conservation-decisions-what-does-the-structure-say-when-does-intervention-begin","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/documentation-and-reading-in-conservation-decisions-what-does-the-structure-say-when-does-intervention-begin\/","title":{"rendered":"Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say, When Does Intervention Begin?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say? | HMSA Academy<\/title>\n <meta name=\"description\" content=\"Addressing the processes of documentation and reading the structure, which are critical stages in the restoration of cultural heritage buildings, within the context of conservation decisions.\">\n <meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"documentation, restoration, reading the structure, cultural heritage, conservation decisions, restoration ethics, historic building analysis\">\n <meta name=\"author\" content=\"HMSA Academy\">\n\n \n <style>\n .hmsa-article-wrapper {\n font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, sans-serif;\n max-width: 800px;\n margin: 40px auto;\n padding: 0 20px;\n color: #333;\n line-height: 1.6;\n }\n\n \/* Header Area *\/\n .hmsa-header-meta {\n font-size: 13px;\n color: #ba372a; \/* Red Theme *\/\n font-weight: 700;\n text-transform: uppercase;\n letter-spacing: 1px;\n margin-bottom: 10px;\n }\n\n .hmsa-main-title {\n font-size: 34px;\n font-weight: 800;\n color: #111;\n line-height: 1.3;\n margin: 0 0 20px 0;\n padding-bottom: 20px;\n border-bottom: 1px solid #eee;\n }\n\n .hmsa-author-info {\n font-size: 15px;\n color: #666;\n margin-bottom: 40px;\n font-style: italic;\n }\n .hmsa-author-info strong {\n color: #ba372a;\n font-style: normal;\n }\n\n \/* Abstract \/ Intro Box *\/\n .hmsa-intro-box {\n background-color: #fcfcfc;\n border-left: 5px solid #ba372a;\n padding: 25px 30px;\n margin-bottom: 40px;\n border-radius: 0 4px 4px 0;\n }\n .hmsa-intro-title {\n font-size: 18px;\n font-weight: 800;\n color: #ba372a;\n margin-top: 0;\n margin-bottom: 15px;\n }\n .hmsa-intro-text {\n font-size: 16px;\n font-style: italic;\n color: #555;\n margin: 0;\n text-align: justify;\n }\n\n \/* Content Body *\/\n .hmsa-subhead {\n font-size: 24px;\n font-weight: 700;\n color: #ba372a;\n margin-top: 50px;\n margin-bottom: 20px;\n border-bottom: 1px solid #f0f0f0;\n padding-bottom: 10px;\n }\n\n .hmsa-paragraph {\n font-size: 18px;\n line-height: 1.8;\n color: #222;\n margin-bottom: 25px;\n text-align: justify;\n }\n\n .hmsa-list {\n list-style: disc;\n padding-left: 20px;\n margin: 20px 0 30px 40px;\n }\n .hmsa-list li {\n margin-bottom: 12px;\n font-size: 18px;\n line-height: 1.6;\n color: #333;\n text-align: justify;\n }\n\n \/* References Area *\/\n .hmsa-ref-section {\n margin-top: 80px;\n padding: 40px;\n background-color: #f9f9f9;\n border-radius: 8px;\n border-top: 3px solid #eee;\n }\n .hmsa-ref-title {\n display: block;\n font-size: 20px;\n font-weight: 800;\n color: #333;\n margin-bottom: 20px;\n }\n .hmsa-ref-list {\n list-style: none;\n padding: 0;\n margin: 0;\n }\n .hmsa-ref-list li {\n font-size: 14px;\n color: #666;\n margin-bottom: 8px;\n line-height: 1.5;\n padding-left: 15px;\n text-indent: -15px;\n }\n\n \/* Mobile Responsiveness *\/\n @media (max-width: 768px) {\n .hmsa-article-wrapper { padding: 0 15px; margin: 20px auto; }\n .hmsa-main-title { font-size: 26px; }\n .hmsa-subhead { font-size: 20px; margin-top: 30px; }\n .hmsa-paragraph { font-size: 16px; }\n .hmsa-intro-box { padding: 20px; }\n }\n <\/style>\n<\/head>\n<body data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1 data-rsssl=1>\n\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-article-wrapper\">\n \n \n <div class=\"hmsa-header-meta\">HMSA Academy: Conservation Theory & Methodology<\/div>\n <h1 class=\"hmsa-main-title\">Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say, When Does Intervention Begin?<\/h1>\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-author-info\">\n Author: <strong>M\u00fcge G\u00fcnel<\/strong> <span> \/\/ M.Arch & Restoration Specialist<\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-intro-box\">\n <h3 class=\"hmsa-intro-title\">Abstract<\/h3>\n <p class=\"hmsa-intro-text\">\n This study addresses the processes of documentation and “reading the structure,” which are among the most critical stages of the restoration process in cultural heritage buildings, within the context of conservation decisions. The quality of data produced before intervention and how this data is interpreted directly determine the scope, method, and ethical limits of the restoration. Documentation is not merely a technical stage that records the current state of the structure; it is an active decision-making mechanism that questions the necessity, timing, and limits of the intervention. The study discusses the irreversible risks of interventions initiated without reading the structure and evaluates the relationship between documentation and intervention in light of conservation theory and international charters.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Introduction<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The restoration process in cultural heritage buildings is not an application area defined solely by physical interventions. The process of documentation and “reading the structure” carried out before intervention constitutes the fundamental stages that determine the direction, limits, and ethical framework of the restoration. This process, which is less visible compared to the application, plays a decisive role in grounding conservation decisions on a scientific and sustainable basis.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Any intervention initiated without producing sufficient data about the structure and interpreting this data can irreversibly damage not only the physical integrity of the structure but also its historical, documentary, and cultural values. Therefore, the critical question in the restoration process is not <em>how<\/em> the intervention will be done, but <em>based on what information<\/em> and <em>when<\/em> it should be initiated.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Documentation: Definition, Purpose, and Scope<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Documentation is the systematic recording of the current state of a cultural property. Survey drawings (r\u00f6l\u00f6ve), photographic records, written assessments, and material and deterioration maps constitute the basic tools of this process. However, documentation should not be treated merely as a technical recording activity.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The documentation process aims:\n <\/p>\n <ul class=\"hmsa-list\">\n <li>To understand the structure, not just to freeze its current state,<\/li>\n <li>To limit the intervention, not to legitimize it,<\/li>\n <li>To start the application at the right time, not to speed it up.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n In this respect, documentation is not a passive preliminary stage of restoration; it is an active component of the direct decision-making process.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Reading the Structure: From Physical Traces to Historical Data<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Reading the structure consists of more than just detecting visible damage. Stratification on wall surfaces, material differences, traces of repairs, and forms of deterioration provide significant data regarding the phases the structure has undergone. These traces are often physical witnesses to historical processes not found in written sources.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Every irregularity or deterioration seen on the structure must be evaluated as data before being treated as a technical problem. This approach renders deterioration not merely a defect to be remedied, but an element that produces information about the structure’s past when read correctly.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Risks of Intervention Without Reading<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Restoration applications initiated without sufficiently conducting the documentation and reading process often yield irreversible results. Incorrect periodization, loss of original material, and the production of artificial integrity are at the forefront of these risks.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Especially in multi-layered structures, when decisions regarding which period to preserve are made without sufficient reading, the structure is either reduced to a single period or hybrid solutions emerge that disrupt historical continuity. This situation weakens the documentary value of the structure while making the scientific quality of the restoration controversial.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">The Ethical Relationship Between Documentation and Intervention<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The documentation process functions not as the initiator of intervention, but often as a mechanism that delays, narrows, and forces a rethinking of it. In this respect, documentation is a significant ethical balance element in restoration practice.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n The scope and method of intervention can only become clear as a result of evaluating the data obtained through documentation. This relationship reveals that documentation is not a secondary tool serving the application, but a fundamental decision-making mechanism that guides and limits the intervention.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <h2 class=\"hmsa-subhead\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n In the conservation of cultural heritage, the process of documentation and reading the structure is not the starting point of intervention; it is often a threshold area questioning the necessity of the intervention. Every application made without understanding what the structure says carries the risk of producing information loss, even if it bears a conservation purpose.\n <\/p>\n <p class=\"hmsa-paragraph\">\n Therefore, success in restoration practice should be measured not only by correct applications but by the ability to stop, wait, and prioritize understanding at the right time. Intervention should begin only when the structure speaks and the obtained data make this intervention mandatory.\n <\/p>\n\n \n <div class=\"hmsa-ref-section\">\n <span class=\"hmsa-ref-title\">References<\/span>\n <ul class=\"hmsa-ref-list\">\n <li>Ahunbay, Z. (2014). Tarihi \u00c7evre Koruma ve Restorasyon. Istanbul: YEM Yay\u0131n.<\/li>\n <li>Avrami, E., Mason, R., & de la Torre, M. (2000). Values and Heritage Conservation. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.<\/li>\n <li>Feilden, B. M. (2003). Conservation of Historic Buildings. Oxford: Architectural Press.<\/li>\n <li>ICOMOS. (1964). The Venice Charter.<\/li>\n <li>ICOMOS Australia. (2013). The Burra Charter.<\/li>\n <li>Jokilehto, J. (1999). A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford.<\/li>\n <li>Mu\u00f1oz Vi\u00f1as, S. (2005). Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Oxford.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n<\/body>\n<\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Documentation and Reading in Conservation Decisions: What Does the Structure Say? | HMSA Academy HMSA Academy: Conservation Theory & Methodology<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3181","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.letoon.com.tr\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}